LLM review integration #55

Open
opened 2025-09-30 13:55:27 +00:00 by cherniginma · 0 comments
cherniginma commented 2025-09-30 13:55:27 +00:00 (Migrated from git.csit.sgu.ru)

I really want to have ability to partially delegate review process to LLM. But not every student would like to have LLM as a reviewer instead of human being. So, the proposal is to have a button on a student side of submission to get LLM review. This would allow to get fast review even thought it might be inaccurate. This kind of review does not represent actual mark for the task: mark will always require human being.

For student:

  • ability to get some review fast
  • find obvious mistakes without teacher

For teacher, if student triggered such LLM review:

  • draft of a review, which he can then approve or edit
I really want to have ability to partially delegate review process to LLM. But not every student would like to have LLM as a reviewer instead of human being. So, the proposal is to have a button on a student side of submission to get LLM review. This would allow to get fast review even thought it might be inaccurate. This *kind* of review does not represent actual mark for the task: mark will always require human being. For student: - ability to get some review fast - find obvious mistakes without teacher For teacher, if student triggered such LLM review: - draft of a review, which he can then approve or edit
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
dsc/mm-backend#55
No description provided.